Commentary | Open Access
Planning in/for/with the Public
| Views: | 3298 | | | Downloads: | 1705 |
Abstract: This commentary traces key issues attaching to the use of the word ‘public’ within planning practices and theories. It argues for an alternative, non-binary engagement with public practices that may profit from being cast in a Foucauldian language and epistemology.
Keywords: alternative practices; dispositive; Foucauldian language; public sphere
Published:
© Ulf Strohmayer. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction of the work without further permission provided the original author(s) and source are credited.