EU Transparency as ‘Documents’: Still Fit for Purpose?

Open Access Journal | ISSN: 2183-2463

Commentary | Open Access

EU Transparency as ‘Documents’: Still Fit for Purpose?


  • Maarten Hillebrandt Eric Castrén Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki, Finland


Full Text   PDF (free download)
Views: 554 | Downloads: 245


Abstract:  In this thematic issue, the question whether EU decision making might be characterised by an excess of transparency stands central. This contribution addresses an issue that precedes such questions of quantity: that of transparency’s qualities, i.e., its specific shape. From an early point in time, transparency in the EU has been equated with the narrow and legalistic notion of ‘access to documents.’ Although since then, transparency has become associated with a wider range of practices, the Union has not managed to shake off the concept’s association with bureaucracy, opacity, and complexity. This remains the case, in spite of the fact that administrations and decision-makers across the world increasingly utilise the possibilities of technological innovation to communicate more directly with their electorates. In this changing communicative context, this commentary considers whether EU transparency as access to documents is still fit for purpose. It does so by exploring access policy from the vantage point of legal developments, administrative practices, political dynamics, and technological innovations. The commentary concludes that while improvements are needed, the access to documents concept endures. However, access to documents needs to be complemented by constructive (rather than predatory) public justification and contestation, to remain viable.

Keywords:  access to documents; administrative circumvention; document base; European Union; record keeping; transparency

Published:   31 March 2021


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.4134


© Maarten Hillebrandt. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction of the work without further permission provided the original author(s) and source are credited.