Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting

Open Access Journal | ISSN: 2183-2463

Editorial | Open Access

Editor’s Introduction: The Promise and Peril of Ranked Choice Voting


  • Caroline J. Tolbert Department of Political Science, University of Iowa, USA
  • Daria Kuznetsova Department of Political Science, University of Iowa, USA


Full Text   PDF (free download)
Views: 662 | Downloads: 387


Abstract:  Dissatisfaction with two-party politics is at an all-time high in the US. As extreme polarization and minority rule persist, a possibility of an electoral reform becomes increasingly more likely. This editor’s introduction discusses the ranked choice voting (RCV) as an alternative to the current single-member geographic districts with winner-take-all plurality elections in the US. The articles for this thematic issue critically evaluate whether RCV lives up to its promise in improving democracy in the US. Like any rule or institutional change, it has benefits and drawbacks. The empirical and historical research presented here focuses on the implementation and use of RCV in the US compared to other countries. This thematic issue offers new insights into the promise and perils of RCV as a way to aggregate votes in elections that ensure that the winning candidate receives a majority of the votes cast.

Keywords:  alternative vote; electoral system; democracy; multipartism; plurality elections; polarization; proportional representation; ranked choice voting; single transferable vote; two-party system

Published:   15 June 2021


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4385


© Caroline J. Tolbert, Daria Kuznetsova. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction of the work without further permission provided the original author(s) and source are credited.