Article | Open Access
| Ahead of Print | Last Modified: 24 September 2025
Testing Staff Roles in the Danish Parliament
Views: | 143 | | | Downloads: | 48 |
Abstract: Investments in parliamentary staff in many countries raise the question: What tasks do they perform in exchange for the public money with which they are paid? So far, academics have mainly described the work of such employees in individual legislatures and have studied them more sophisticatedly in the US and the European Parliament. However, theory-driven empirical comparisons between national parliamentary staff in Europe are mostly missing, especially regarding their partisan side. An exception is the conceptual model developed by Brandsma and Otjes (2024) in a study about all employees of the Dutch lower house. This article applies that tool to another case, the Danish parliament (Folketing), with the dual aims of finding patterns by comparing it to the Netherlands and assessing the comprehensiveness of the model. Interviews with almost all political parties and three managers of the non-partisan staff of the Folketing suggest that the categorization of Brandsma and Otjes (2024) mostly covers the tasks of their staff, but omits important subroles regarding international diplomacy.
Keywords: Danish parliament; legislatures; parliamentary staff; party staff; political parties
Published:
Ahead of Print
Issue:
Vol 14 (2026): Understanding the Role of Political Staff and Parliamentary Administrations (In Progress)
© Stijn van Voorst. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction of the work without further permission provided the original author(s) and source are credited.