Politics and Governance

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2183-2463

Article | Open Access | Ahead of Print | Last Modified: 20 November 2023

Public Employment Services' Responses to the Pandemic: Examples from Portugal, Bulgaria, and Lithuania

  • Ana Sofia Ribeiro Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal
  • Vladislava Lendzhova South‐West University “Neofit Rilski,” Bulgaria
  • Sonata Vyšniauskienė Institute of Sociology and Social Work, Vilnius University, Lithuania
  • Tatiana Ferreira School of Education, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal
  • João Carlos Sousa Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal
  • Isabel Roque Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal
  • Kerli Kõiv Institute of Education, University of Tartu, Estonia
  • Katrin Saks Institute of Education, University of Tartu, Estonia
  • Omeed Agahi Department of Education and Psychology, University of Girona, Spain
  • Òscar Prieto‐Flores Department of Education and Psychology, University of Girona, Spain
  • Niall O’Higgins International Labour Organization, Switzerland / Department of Economic Sciences and Statistics (DIES), University of Salerno, Italy
Full Text   PDF (free download)
Views: 346 | Downloads: 57


Abstract:  The Covid-19 pandemic provoked critical changes to welfare in Europe, requiring the dematerialisation of programmes and services while relying mainly on remote support. This study aims to present insights into how European public employment services have coped and adapted to the pandemic challenges, particularly regarding the digitalisation and delivery of services to young people in rural areas. It focuses on three case studies from distinct European regions: Portugal, Bulgaria, and Lithuania. It is based on an exploratory survey of public employment services national offices and qualitative data collected from public employment services offices in rural settings. It highlights the advantages and dangers of the adoption of digitalisation processes, namely considering literacy and accessibility in diverse contexts. It concludes that despite cultural and regional differences, all three countries evidenced an acceleration in service provision due to digitalisation and were capable of adjusting their practices to remote delivery. However, rural areas faced delays due to poor infrastructure, and after the pandemic, public employment privileged on-site delivery, since it is considered more effective in the training and counselling of young people.

Keywords:  Bulgaria; Covid‐19; digitalisation; Lithuania; Portugal; public employment services

Published:   Ahead of Print

Issue:   Active Labour Market Policies and Youth Employment in European Peripheries (Forthcoming)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7437


© Ana Sofia Ribeiro, Vladislava Lendzhova, Sonata Vyšniauskienė, Tatiana Ferreira, João Carlos Sousa, Isabel Roque, Kerli Koiv, Katrin Saks, Omeed Agahi, Óscar Prieto-Flores, Niall O'higgins. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction of the work without further permission provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

© Cogitatio Press (Lisbon, Portugal) unless otherwise stated | Privacy Policy | Homepage