Who Undermines the Welfare State? Austerity-Dogmatism and the U-Turn in Swedish Asylum Policy

Open Access Journal | ISSN: 2183-2803

Article | Open Access

Who Undermines the Welfare State? Austerity-Dogmatism and the U-Turn in Swedish Asylum Policy


  • Simone Scarpa REMESO—Institute for Research on Migration, Ethnicity and Society, Linköping University, Sweden
  • Carl-Ulrik Schierup REMESO—Institute for Research on Migration, Ethnicity and Society, Linköping University, Sweden


Full Text   PDF (free download)
Views: 2145 | Downloads: 1878


Abstract:  Within the EU, the so-called “refugee crisis” has been predominantly dealt with as an ill-timed and untenable financial burden. Since the 2007–08 financial crisis, the overarching objective of policy initiatives by EU-governments has been to keep public expenditure firmly under control. Thus, Sweden’s decision to grant permanent residence to all Syrians seeking asylum in 2013 seemed to represent a paradigmatic exception, pointing to the possibility of combining a humanitarian approach in the “long summer of migration” with generous welfare provisions. At the end of 2015, however, Sweden reversed its asylum policy, reducing its intake of refugees to the EU-mandated minimum. The main political parties embraced the mainstream view that an open-door refugee policy is not only detrimental to the welfare state, but could possibly trigger a “system breakdown”. In this article, we challenge this widely accepted narrative by arguing that the sustainability of the Swedish welfare state has not been undermined by refugee migration but rather by the Swedish government’s unbending adherence to austerity politics. Austerity politics have weakened the Swedish welfare state’s socially integrative functions and prevented the implementation of a more ambitious growth agenda, harvesting a potentially dynamic interplay of expansionary economic policies and a humanitarian asylum policy.

Keywords:  asylum policy; austerity; crisis; refugee; Sweden; welfare state

Published:   29 March 2018


DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1285


© Simone Scarpa, Carl-Ulrik Schierup. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction of the work without further permission provided the original author(s) and source are credited.